Yesterday
we were working on breaking out of a headlock. Being a jujitsu and aikido
practitioner I’ve tried my fair share in my time. Everything from practical
moves to more fun but unpractical.
What really
hit me was while I was teaching, that my thoughts were going through the “that
this move is from jujitsu – that style, and this is from aikido” and so on.
What really hit me was the moment I doubted myself not really knowing if the
movement was from 1 style or the other. It was then I came to see them as the
same. It wasn’t really the technique that was different but the principle
behind that was different. A greater understanding on the Blooms taxonomy
levels.
So when
teaching I don’t know were the technique is “from”, but use the terminology and
ideas the student knows. If he’s from jujitsu I explain using that terminology
and techniques, and from karate I use those.
Students might think what they have is unique to their style, but that’s
because they are only on a low level of understanding on the Blooms taxonomy.
Or as some have put it, level of substance understanding.
Ingen kommentarer:
Send en kommentar