Linage has
always been important. It tells something about who your teacher /school is. Look
at business (Harvard , MIT and so on) or the UFC. Getting connected to the
right school, gives you a basis for doing well. It can’t guaranty you success,
but they have proven that they know some “tricks”, and as a minimum you get
these “served”.
Even when
you’re out in life, referencing your “linage” can be a sign of quality. But
really what counts is how you utilize the stuff you’ve learned. You can have
the best credentials and the best teachers, but this doesn’t mean you
automatically do “magic stuff” or the right things.
Being able
to build on your experience, and be able to make it work for you is something
you are. Teachers and Schools can set up the learning environment and optimize
the learning experience, but it’s up to the student to learn and to “get it”.
So when
Sense’s/teachers/coaches boast or reference there “linage”, it’s just part of
it. And if you look at Blooms taxonomy, you’ll see it’s just the lower part of
understanding/learning. What really counts is the understanding and being able
to share, analysis, elaborate and use what you have learned, which is the
higher part of Blooms. So look at the students, and see how well they perform.
When
looking at performance many parameters should be considered, from a technical
point of view to a social relationship standard, were the 2 mentioned are the
most dominant. The technical view is for
many “easy” to see compared to the relationship overview. Physical techniques
can easily be shown and tested, while relationships are built on known and unknown
rules, and the corresponding dynamics can be hard to see. But it is here you’ll
see whether a teacher helps build his students, and sees them as individuals or
he sees them as possible clones of himself.
A student
will never reach their potential if the teacher/coach doesn’t give them the possibility
to grow and evolve. The questions is how to see this, since every school or
dojo, has some requirements that are fundamental. Some of them are pure
technical and sometimes quite many, were a couple of thousands don’ the most I’ve
heard, while others concentrate on more the mental part. These two extrems are
easly spottet for what they are, it’s when they mix and only fill small parts
of the “school” or are downplayed. That’s what you’ll look for.
Another “trait”
is to look for the “super sensei”. He’ll have answers for everything, and
nothing but his own fit’s to what he’s doing, even the most obvious. Doing self
defense is doing what works, and if you can have success by running around in
big clogs, smoking a joint… prove it and do it… if it works.
So we are
back to … what works… linage might be important, if it works, and see if the
students can get it to work for themselves in any area and you have a school/dojo
that will give you great basis for doing your best at selfdefense.
Ingen kommentarer:
Send en kommentar